CHANGING DYNAMICS OF PAKISTAN’S KASHMIR POLICY

Authors

  • Muhammad Maqbool Khan
  • Dr. Surrya Bano

Keywords:

Kashmir, India, Pakistan, UN plebiscite, security, nationalism, settlement, legitimate

Abstract

The India–Pakistan dispute over Kashmir is one of the most
intractable international conflicts in today’s world. The Kashmir
dispute dates back to 1947, when Britain granted independence to its
Indian colony. Pakistan insists that India has no legal or moral right
to Muslim majority Kashmir and rejects its attempts to gain
international acceptance of the territorial status quo. This paper lays
out the public and private position of the government in Islamabad on
Kashmir and relations with India. Kashmir has been an important
factor in Pakistan’s security policy vis-à-vis India and Pakistan has
always directed its efforts to find a settlement of this long standing
issue. Some Pakistani governments have used the Kashmir conflict to
reinforce Pakistani nationalism and others to strengthen panIslamism in addition to acquire domestic legitimacy or to ensure
regime survival. Pakistan governments would prefer the
implementation of UN Security Council resolutions that envisaged the
Kashmiri people determining in a plebiscite, under UN auspices,
whether to accede to Pakistan or India. However, conscious that a
plebiscite is unacceptable to India, Pakistan is also exploring, albeit
unofficially, other solutions that would best promote Pakistan’s
strategic and political interests in order to adjust it to post 9/11
security environment.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Maqbool Khan

Scholar of UOB 

Dr. Surrya Bano

Assistant Professor in Pakistan Study Centre of UOb 

References

For two overviews of the Kashmir problem see Jonah Blank, ‘Kashmir:

Fundamentalism Takes Root’, Foreign Affairs November–December 1999 and

SumitGanguly, The Crisis in Kashmir: Portents of War and Hopes of Peace (New York:

Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Cambridge University Press 1997).

See, for example, Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee's Independence Day

Remarks delivered on August 15, 2002. This address is available online at the Indian

Government's Information Center, pmindia.nic.in/infocentre/curr_speeches.htm

Joseph Korbel, Danger in Kashmir (Oxford, 2002; first published by Princeton

University Press, 1954), pp. 26-28, 42-43.

Alastair Lamb, Kashmir: A Disputed Legacy (Roxford Books, 1991), p. 112.

See Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema, ‘Pakistan, India, and Kashmir: A Historical Review’, in

Raju G.C. Thomas (ed.), Perspectives on Kashmir: The Roots of Conflict in South Asia

(Boulder: Westview Press, 1992), p. 94.

Ibid. 95

Lord Birdwood, “Kashmir,” International Affairs 28 (July 1952), p. 302.

Sir William Barton, “Pakistan’s Claim to Kashmir,” Foreign Affairs 28 (January

, p. 300.

Shuja Nawaz, Crossed Swords: Pakistan, Its Army and the Wars Within (Oxford

University Press, 2009), p. 49.

See Hari Singh's letter to Mountbatten in Verinder Grover, ed.,The Story of Kashmir:Yesterday and Today (vol. 3)

(New Delhi: Deep and Deep Publishing, 1995), p.108.

NavnitaChedaBahera, Demystifying Kashmir (Washington D.C: Brookings Institution

Press, 2006), p. 28. 13Ibid., p. 29.

Chaudhri Muhammad Ali, The Emergence of Pakistan(New York: Columbia

University Press, 1967), p. 100. 15 The Security Council resolution of 21 April 1948 noted with “satisfaction that

both India and Pakistan desire that the question of the accession of Jammu and

Kashmir to India or Pakistan should be decided through the democratic method of

a free and impartial plebiscite”. The Security Council resolution of 14 March 1950

commended the governments of India and Pakistan for reaching agreement on the

determination of Jammu and Kashmir’s “final disposition in accordance with the

will of the people through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite”.

Text of resolutions in Josef Korbel,Danger in Kashmir (Princeton University Press,

, Appendix I, pp. 307-312; Appendix IV, pp. 319-321.

Simla Agreement, 2 July 1972. 17Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema, “Pakistan, India, and Kashmir: A Historical Review”,

op.cit., p. 94.

In defence of the continued validity of the UN resolutions on Kashmir see Ijaz

Hussain, Kashmir Dispute: An International Law Perspective. (Rawalpindi: Services Book

Club, 2000), Ch.V.

Syed Rifaat Hussain, “Pakistan’s Changing Outlook on Kashmir”. Retrieved from

http://acdis.illinois.edu/assets/docs/222/articles/Pakistan39sChangingOutlookon

Kashmir.pdf

“Kashmir only dispute between Pakistan and India”, The News, February 5, 2002.

Syed Rifaat Hussain, op.cit.

ShahidM. Amin, “A Re-Evaluation of the Kashmir Dispute,”Pakistan Horizon, vol.

(April 2003), p.38.

Akbar S. Ahmed, Jinnah, Pakistan, and Islamic Identity: The Search for Saladin (New

York: Routledge, 1997), p. 80.

See, Matthew P. Taylor, “Pakistan’s Kashmir Policy and Strategy Since 1947,”

(Master’s Diss., Naval Post Graduate School, California, 2004), pp. 5-6.

Pakistan’s Complaint against India, S/646, 1948, cited in Sisir Gupta, Kashmir: A

Study in India- Pakistan Relations (New York: Asia Publishing House, 1966), p. 145.

Matthew P. Taylor, op.cit., p. 6. 27 Ibid.

Ibid.

This argument is often found in the U.S. press and supported by Indian military

officers and scholars. See Pamela Constable, “As Civilian Heads Pursue Peace,

Militaries Fuel Kashmir Conflict,” New York Times, 30 May 1999, p. 19. “Military

Hard -Liners Pressure Pakistani Leader,” Wall Street Journal, 27 June 2002, p.15.

Matthew P. Taylor, op.cit., p. 7.

Mohammed Ayub Khan, “Pakistan Perspective,” Foreign Affairs 38 (July 1960), p.

Matthew P. Taylor, op.cit., p. 7.

Ibid.

Ibid., p. 8.

Ibid. 36 Ibid

Sisir Gupta, op.cit., p. 131.

Amelie Blom, “The Multi-Vocal State: The Policy of Pakistan on Kashmir,” in

Pakistan: Nationalism without a Nation?, ed. Christophe Jaffrelot, (New York: Zed

Books, 2002), pp. 283-309.

“Text of President Musharraf’s Address to the Nation,” Dawn, 12 January 2002,

http://www.dawn.com/2002/01/12/speech02112.htm.

Riaz Ali Shah, Dr. Riaz Ali Shah’s Diary (Lahore: Publishing House BullRoad,

quoted in HabiburRehman, Kashmir: The Jugular vein of Pakistan

(Rawalpindi: Kashmir Liberation Cell, 1998), p. 23.

Quoted in Owen Bennett Jones, Pakistan: Eye of the Storm (New Haven: Yale

University Press, 2002), p. 57.

M. Rafique Afzal, Pakistan: History and Politics, 1947-1971 (Oxford: Oxford

University Press, 2001), p. 4

Owen Bennett Jones, Pakistan: Eye of the Storm (New Haven: Yale University Press,

, p. 70.

Victoria Schofield, Kashmir in the Crossfire (New York: I.B. Tauris, 1996), p. 157.

United Nations Commission for India and Pakistan, Resolution Adopted by the

UNCIP on 13 August 1948 (Document No. S/1100, Para 75, 9 November 1948),

http://www.un.int/pakistan/00home04.htm. UNCIP was a five-member

commission established by the UN in January 1948 to mediate and investigate the

dispute. In 1951 the United Nations Military Observers Group for India and

Pakistan (UNMOGIP) replaced the UNCIP.

Absar Hussain Rizvi, “Remembering Tashkent Declaration”, The Muslim,

Islamabad, January 1, 1991.

In fact, Kashmiris opted to distance themselves from Pakistani military and

irregular infiltrators.

See Air Marshal Ayaz Ahmad Khan, “India-Pakistan Relations,” Frontier Post,

September 8, 2000.

Hamid Yusuf, Pakistan: A Study of Political Developments 1947-97 (Sang-e-Meel

Publications, Lahore, 1991), p. 91.

Krishna Menon, a former Indian Defence Minister, declared that India hadnot

‘abjured violence’ and would solve the ‘Pakistan problem’ as it had donethe ‘Goa

problem’ Sanjiva Reddy, President of the Indian National Congress,advocated a

forcible ‘liberation of Azad Kashmir’ leaving the time of suchventure to the Indian

In fact, Kashmiris opted to distance themselves from Pakistani military and

irregular infiltrators.

See Air Marshal Ayaz Ahmad Khan, “India-Pakistan Relations,” Frontier Post,

September 8, 2000.

Hamid Yusuf, Pakistan: A Study of Political Developments 1947-97 (Sang-e-Meel

Publications, Lahore, 1991), p. 91.

Krishna Menon, a former Indian Defence Minister, declared that India hadnot

‘abjured violence’ and would solve the ‘Pakistan problem’ as it had donethe ‘Goa

problem’ Sanjiva Reddy, President of the Indian National Congress,advocated a

forcible ‘liberation of Azad Kashmir’ leaving the time of suchventure to the Indian

government. Nehru stated that the use of force was aquestion of ‘suitability and

opportunity’.

Field Marshal M. AyubKhan,Speeches and statements (October 1958—June 1959),

Volume 1 (Pakistan Government Publications, Karachi; 1ST edition, 1959), p.69.

P.R. Chari, Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema and Stephen P. Cohn, Perception, Politics and

Security in South Asia (London: Routledge Curzen, 2003), p. 42.

Robert G. Wirsing, India, Pakistan, and the Kashmir Dispute (New York: St. Martin’s,

, p. 190.

Victoria Schafiled,Kashmir in Conflict: Pakistan and Unfinished War (London:

I.B. Tauris, 2000), p. 123.

Mussawat(Lahore, 2 March, 1975).

RajendraSareen,Pakistan: The Indian Factor (New Delhi: VikasPublishers, 1984), p.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, “Pakistan Builds Anew,” Foreign Affairs Vol 51(April 1973), p.

As cited in AjitBhattacharjea, Z.A.Bhutto's Double Speak: Turning Defeat into

Victory. The Vines of India, (New Delhi. May 3, 1995). 59 P.S. Verma, Jammu and Kashmir at the Political Cross Roads (New Delhi, 1994), p.229;

also see Victoria Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict: India, Pakistan and the Unending

War (I. B. Tauris, January2003), p.140.

M.H. Askari, “Kashmir: A New Phase”. Dawn, January 24, 1990.

Mirza, “Pakistan’s Kashmir Policy in 1990s,” p. 73.

RajendraSareen,Pakistan: The Indian Factor (New Delhi: VikasPublishers, 1984), p.

Ashley J. Tellis, “The Changing Political-Military Environment: South Asia,” in

The United States and Asia: Toward a New U.S. Strategy and Force Posture, MR-1315-AF

(Santa Moncia: RAND, 2001), p. 223.

SumitGanguly, “The Islamic Dimensions of the Kashmir Insurgency,” in Pakistan:

Nationalism without a Nation?, ed. Christophe Jaffrelot (New York: Zed Books, 2002),

p. 189.

Interview with Benazir Bhutto, The Nation, June 4, 2003.

SumitGanguly, Conflict Unending: India-Pakistan Tensions since 1947 (New York:

Columbia Universtiy Press, 2001), pp. 121-22.

Ashley J. Tellis, C. Christine Fair, and Jamison Jo Medby, Limited Conflict Under the

Nuclear Umbrella: Indian and Pakistani Lessons from the Kargil Crisis, MR-1450-USCA

(Santa Monica: RAND, 2001), pp. 48-49.

ShaukatQadir, “An Analysis of the Kargil Conflict 1999,” RUSI Journal (April

, p. 24.

Feroz Hassan Khan, “The Independence-Dependence Paradox: Stability

Dilemmas in South Asia,” Arms Control Today (October 2003), p. 17.

Tellis, Fair, and Medby, Limited Conflict Under the Nuclear Umbrella, op.cit.,p.ix. 71 Ibid.

Ibid.

Quotations in this paragraph are from “Highlights of General Pervez Musharraf’s

Address to the Nation,” Dawn, September 19,

http://dawn.com/events/speech/20010919

“Musharraf’s speech on September 19 2001,” TheNews, September 20, 2001.

“President Bush Address to a Joint Session of Congress and American People,”

September 20, 2001, http://articles.cnn.com/2001-09-

/us/gen.bush.transcript_1_joint-sessionnational-anthem-citizens?_s=PM:US

(accessed April 10, 2010).

General Musharraf, In the Line of Fire (New York: Free Press, 2006), p. 202. 77Dawn, September 13, 2002.

Smruti S. Pattanaik, “War on Terror and its Impact on Pakistan’s Foreign policy,”

Strategic Analysis vol. 32, no.3 (May 2008), p. 393.

QudssiaAkhlaque, “Dialogue to Start Next Month: Joint Statement on MusharrafVajpayee Meeting,” Dawn, July 1, 2004.

Meeting Indian External Minister Natwar Singh in July 2005, Musharraf called on

the two countries to give up their “maximalist” positions, adding that “Pakistan’s

maximalist position (had) been one enshrined in the UNSC resolution 91 calling for

the holding of a plebiscite in Jammu and Kashmir”. QudssiaAkhlaque, “Musharraf

for giving up ‘maximalist’ positions”, Dawn, 26 July 2004.

Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema, TheNews, October 31, 2004.

SohaibKhaliq, “Pakistan’s Kashmir Policy in New Strategic Environment”, IPRI

Journal XII, no. 1 (Winter 2012), pp. 46-66.

Ibid.

Matthew P. Taylor, op.cit

See Dr. Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema, “Changing Dynamics of the Kashmir Dispute,”

Margalla Papers 2006, NDU, Islamabad.

Matthew P. Taylor, op.cit.

Musharraf’s interview with Karan Thapar in the CNN-IBN, January 13, 2006.

Syed Rifaat Hussain, “Pakistan’s Changing Outlook on Kashmir”. Retrieved from

http://acdis.illinois.edu/assets/docs/222/articles/Pakistan39sChangingOutlookon

Kashmir.pdf

Ibid.

Ibid.

“Pakistan Ready to Meet India Halfway on Kashmir,” Reuters, 18 December 2003,

http://www.reuteres.com/printerFriendlyPopup.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=4

“Text of President Musharraf’s Address to the Nation,” Dawn, 12 January 2002,

http://www.dawn.com/2002/01/12/speech02112.htm.

“Text of President Musharraf’s Address to the Nation,” 12 January 2002, Dawn,

http://www.dawn.com/2002/01/12/speech020112.htm. 94 Quoted in “Musharraf Says No Sell-out on Kashmir,” Dawn, 20 January 2004,

http://www.dawn.com/2004/01/20/ toph4.htm.

Hindu, India, March 10, 2008,

www.thehindu.com/mp/2008/03/10/chenindx.htm (accessed July 23, 2010).

PPP Manifesto 2008, p. 20, http://www.ppp.org.pk/manifestos /2008.pdf.

Rising Kashmir, Srinagar, March 3, 2008, www.risingkashmir.com/index.php

(accessed July 23, 2010).

Nirupama Subramanian, ‘Kashmir an ‘Integral Part’ of Pakistan: Zardari,” Hindu,

March 9, 2008, http://www.thehindu.com/2008/03/09/stories/2008030955000900

(accessed July 23, 2010).

George Perkovich and Toby Dalton, “India and Pakistan: A thin line between

War and Peace,” June 3, 2014. Retrieved

http://nationationalinterst.org/feature/india-pakistan-thin-line-between-war-peace10584

Kashmir Solidarity Day is celeberated every year on 5th May.

MunirAkram, “Engaging Modi” Dawn, May 25, 2014.

Ibid.

Ibid.

“Turning a new page Nawaz to Modi: Let’s turn similarities into strengths,” The

Express Tribune, May 27, 2014.

Ibid.

George, op. cit.

Ibid.

“Turning a new page Nawaz to Modi: op.cit

“India trip: ‘Nawaz turned win-win situation into disaster,” The Express Tribune,

May 29, 2014.

Ibid 111MunirAkram, op.cit

Ibid

See Husain Haqqani, “Pakistan’s End game in Kashmir,” Carnegie Endowment

for International Peace in Washington, DC Published online: 04 Jun 2010. 114S. M. Burke, Pakistan's Foreign Policy: An Historical Analysis (Oxford University

Press, 1973), pp. 226-30.

See Dr. Pervaiz Iqbal Cheema, “Changing Dynamics of the Kashmir Dispute,”

Margalla Papers 2006, NDU, Islamabad.

Ibid 117 Ibid 118 Ibid

Downloads

Published

2015-12-31